Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does the FSEIS for the SNFPA modify or vacate HFQLG Forests obligation to track reductions in Old Forest Habitat?

0
Posted

Does the FSEIS for the SNFPA modify or vacate HFQLG Forests obligation to track reductions in Old Forest Habitat?

0

Plumas, 01/29/2004) Answer: The monitoring plan for HFQLG should continue as envisioned and defined in the HFQLG FEIS/ROD, including 10% tracking of old growth. Since the Pilot Project is one of several Adaptive Management Experiments underway; it has its own unique questions to be answered. The monitoring identified elsewhere would not be appropriate for the HFQLG pilot project area. • Question: The SNFPA FSEIS ROD (Section E. pages 66-68) states that the Forests under the HFQLG Forest Recovery Act follow the HFQLGFRA FEIS/ROD with some stated exceptions (i.e. retention of large trees 30″ dbh and greater). Is this accurate? Answer: Yes. HFQLG Pilot Project Forests apply land allocations, which are described in the HFQLG Forest Recovery Act ROD and FEIS, with the exception for goshawk territories and marten and fisher habitat management areas with the applicable standards and guidelines in Table 2. (ROD page 67) • Question: Is monitoring expected through the Administrative Study that h

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123