Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does the False Claims Act also cover situations where the defendant owes the Government money?

0
Posted

Does the False Claims Act also cover situations where the defendant owes the Government money?

0

Yes. The “reverse” False Claims Act provision in 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (a)(7) makes it illegal for a defendant to misrepresent the facts to avoid paying an “obligation” owed the Government. With a few notable exceptions, most courts have strictly limited (a)(7)’s applicability to incidents where the obligation concealed, avoided, or decreased was a current, immediate legal obligation to pay money owed, such as in a contract, judgment, or acknowledgment of indebtedness. The Department of Justice has also discouraged pursuit of cases involving innovative interpretations of this provision and, thus, most (a)(7) relators must work hard to obtain a recovery. An example of a violation of the “reverse false claims” provision occurred where defendants failed to record, in tow boat logs, illegally discharged pollutants. The defendants’ policy was to record legal discharges, but not illegal ones. Reverse false claims existed because the defendants did not disclose to the Government their dumping of w

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123