Does the evaluation criteria give more weight to existing projects (i.e. projects already built, interconnected and currently generating)?
First, they must qualify as incremental resources. Certainly with respect to category of status of project and technology viability, yes — existing projects would be scored higher than projects to be developed, because the risk is just not there.But in the terms of market evaluation for existing projects versus development projects, there is no difference.
Related Questions
- Our website uses an existing database and is currently built in PHP using MySQL. Will any modifications need to be made to the database or the connection script to accommodate the migration of PHP from "WebDev" to pubweb?
- Does the evaluation criteria give more weight to existing projects (i.e. projects already built, interconnected and currently generating)?
- Can my unit change our existing evaluation criteria for interim or major reviews?
