Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does the article famous weapon science fiction change the way you look at the issue?”

0
Posted

Does the article famous weapon science fiction change the way you look at the issue?”

0

SF Site is a webzine edited by Rodger Turner. Established in 1996 by John O’Neill, it is based in Canada, but includes contributors from around the world. It publishes reviews of science fiction books, films, and television, and features interviews with authors and fiction excerpts. It is also the web hosting for notable science fiction and fantasy authors such as Guy Gavriel Kay and Charles de Lint and magazines such as Fantasy and Science Fiction. It hosts a science fiction discussion forum and RSS feed. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ushered in the “atomic age”, and the bleak pictures of the bombed-out cities released shortly after the end of World War II became symbols of the power of the new weapons (it is worth noting that the first pictures released were only from distances, and did not contain any human bodies—such pictures would only be released in later years).[citation needed] The first pictures released of a nuclear explosion—the blast from the Trinity test—f

0

For me it’s quite impossible to compare it with The Player of Games or Consider Phlebas. I love them all. May be when I read more I can look back and see more light. Re the final twist, I found that even though it seems tricky and illogical, it certainly makes you review the whole book and try to understand the protagonist in a totally different point of view. At least that’s what it made me. My thoughts are: I think the ending is a brilliant shot. It gives the whole book a brand new meaning. I loved all the vignettes etc. I felt they added to the picture of the main character in a very interesting way, structurally speaking. So I don’t think they were padding – I loved the way the book was put together. In fact I love the book, its a compelling read and one of Banks’ stronger Culture books I’m with you, Coolhand, I just don’t get the character arc. Not only do we not see how Elethiomel became Zakalwe, we don’t see why Elethiomel became the Chairmaker. The whole Chairmaker thing is so

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123