Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does the adaptive landscape of mimicry conform to the theory?

0
Posted

Does the adaptive landscape of mimicry conform to the theory?

0

Butterfly wing patterns and mimicry in particular are an example of an adaptation that might lead to a quantitative test of the theory. Our current understanding of butterfly wing development suggests that wing patterns involve co-option of signalling pathway modules from earlier development (Brunetti et al., 2001). Therefore, it is a reasonable hypothesis that most evolution in wing patterns occurs at wing-specific cis-regulatory elements of these genes, with minimal pleiotropic effects on other developmental functions of the same loci (Carroll et al., 2001). This hypothesis should become testable as a better understanding of wing development is reached, but if true then developmental pleiotropic constraints on wing pattern evolution may be minimal. Furthermore, mimetic butterfly colour patterns are known to contribute to speciation through pleiotropic effects on reproductive isolation. Divergent populations use colour patterns in choosing mates, and intermediate hybrid patterns are n

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123