Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does that also mean that Sarah explicitly represented the R-sameness?

0
Posted

Does that also mean that Sarah explicitly represented the R-sameness?

0

• No • This task only enables the researcher to determine whether the animal explicitly represents the O-relations. • To determine whether the animal explicitly represents the R-sameness, we need a double paired match to sample task. • No non-human animal, not even an intelligent language trained chimp has ever succeeded at learning even the original version of this task • Humans, however, can learn the original task and the transfer task • This shows that humans have made an evolutionary leap. • Humans can recursively represent a presumably infinitely higher level of relatedness. • By that we mean that once they realize that relations can be relations between relations (not just objects), and they explicitly mentally represent a second order representation, then they can also explicitly represent the idea of any higher order relations (3rd, 4th, etc.) • This, in effect, allows humans to break completely free from concrete thinking and, when necessary or even desired, to think complete

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123