Does suggestive information cause a confirmation bias in bullet comparisons?
Several researchers have argued that the confirmation bias, the tendency to selectively gather and process information such that it fits existing beliefs, is a main threat to objective forensic examinations. The goal of the present study was to empirically investigate whether examiners making bullet comparisons are indeed vulnerable to this bias. In the first experiment, six qualified examiners evaluated 6 sets of bullets that were presented to them twice. In the neutral task condition it was mentioned in the case description that there were two perpetrators and two crime scenes, whereas in the potentially biasing task condition it was mentioned that there was only one perpetrator and one crime scene. The results showed no effect of biased information on the decision outcome. An exploratory analysis revealed rather large individual differences in two cases. In a second study we compared the conclusions of first and second examiners of actual cases that were conducted in the period betw
Related Questions
- Does the inevitable variations in bullet seating pressure cause more problems with the highly energetic smokeless?
- What do I do if the Cup/Party Mug leaks while Im mixing ingredients with the Magic Bullet Single Shot?
- Can protonix cause a false positive for THC on 10 panel confirmation drug screen test?
