Does Selective Breeding (Artificial Selection) provide evidence AGAINST Macro*Evolution?
Yes. When we breed dogs, we find that the dog species can be changed up to certain limits. Beyond these limits the dogs are not viable (they die off). The further we move away from the norm of dog-species, the weaker the resulting purebred dogs, the more susceptible to diseases and weakness which ultimately kill them off. The same phenomenon is observed when breeding pigeons or horses. This observation is the opposite of what we would expect if Darwinism were true. If Darwinism were true, the natural expectation is that species should be able to easily change from one to another, and that each species should be infinitely plastic (changeable without any problems). But instead we observe the opposite.
