Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does prior Rituxan therapy take away “chemo naive” status?

away prior rituxan Status therapy
0
Posted

Does prior Rituxan therapy take away “chemo naive” status?

0

Date: March 4, 2008 In one of my recent posts on Harvey’s Journal – Planning For Success I quoted a table from a recent M. D. Anderson paper on the response statistics of FCR combination in previously treated patients. In the breakout of patients into sub-categories based on their prior therapy exposure, there were 7 patients that had been exposed to Rituxan therapy and nothing else. 29% of these “Rituxan-virgins” got a CR, a far cry from the much higher percentage of CRs we saw in truly naïve patients who had not been treated with anything. This statistic drew a lot of attention and caused concern to some patients. Sorry to say, it does not surprise me with my somewhat dour attitude about life – there are no really free lunches out there. But it is a valid point that the sample size of this sub-group was small, only 7 patients. So, to get a more authoritative perspective on Rituxan therapy and impact on subsequent therapy options, I went straight to the source, one of the authors of t

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123