Does PG&E want Simple Cycle CTs that are designed to easily accept expansion to Combined Cycle at a later date?
PG&E does not have a preference for an Offer that easily accepts expansion from simple cycle to combined cycle. The cost of converting over to combined cycle would be taken into account when Offers provide conversion flexibility. 2) Does PG&E have a preference for either the aeroderivative or industrial (frame) type of combustion turbine? (also Section IV, Q20) (new 11-18-04) PG&E will evaluate the costs and benefits of each technology in the context of all the other Offers received.