Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does minimum necessary under Regional Permit 3 (Transportation Projects) imply that retaining walls must be constructed in all cases?

0
Posted

Does minimum necessary under Regional Permit 3 (Transportation Projects) imply that retaining walls must be constructed in all cases?

0

A23. No, it implies that the fill must be minimized. For instance, if the project requires a two-lane culverted crossing of a stream, you could not have extra lanes or shoulders in excess of what is needed or required. In most cases, the District will defer to current standard highway designs and specifications.

0

A22. No, it implies that the fill must be minimized. For instance, if the project requires a two-lane culverted crossing of a stream, you could not have extra lanes or shoulders in excess of what is needed or required. In most cases, the District will defer to current standard highway designs and specifications.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123