Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does mandatory labeling increase the use of nutritional information?

0
Posted

Does mandatory labeling increase the use of nutritional information?

0

Of the 38 countries surveyed, 6 have some form of mandatory nutritional labeling (Canada, United States, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand, and Malaysia). The global average for “understanding” labels was 43% of respondents. The scores for understanding in these 6 countries were higher than the average, except for Malaysia: Canada, 61%; United States, 65%; Brazil, 49%; Australia, 55%; New Zealand, 61%; Malaysia, 22%. The mandatory presence of nutritional labeling does not seem to lead to a greater frequency of use; respondents in the 6 countries were not significantly more likely to “always” check a label (except for Brazil at 52% of respondents, all other countries were <29% of respondents, and the global average was 21% of all respondents). This suggests that the more consumers are exposed to nutritional labeling, the more educated they become. What information are consumers seeking? A global average indicates that fat, calories, and sugar are the items checked most often. GI is checked

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123