Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does likelihood minimize stratigraphic gaps?

gaps stratigraphic
0
Posted

Does likelihood minimize stratigraphic gaps?

0

A parsimony tree of fossil and extant crocodiles1 implied a sum of gaps totaling 743 million years (Ma). This debt distributed over 62 taxa implies a sampling intensity (R) of 0.022 finds per million years2. The stratigraphic ranges of the analyzed taxa reveal that the vast majority of taxa are known from single localities, suggesting a low value of R (ref. 3). In fact, the most likely R given these data (0.011 finds per Ma) 4 is lower than implied by the parsimony tree. As a result, trees positing >1200 Ma of gaps are considered more likely by stratigraphic data than is the parsimony tree (Fig. 1a). Because ln L [R = 0.022|ranges] = -0.2, stratigraphy would not reject the parsimony tree. Note that a tree positing no gaps (and a minimum R = 0.97) has a log likelihood of -22. Stratigraphic data would reject such a tree. Figure 1 Log likelihoods of stratigraphic debts. High resolution image and legend (7k) Good records still posit gaps Many fossil hyaenids are known from numerous localit

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123