Does following your tax research in the Great IRS Hoax book get people in trouble or subject them to IRS financial penalties, such as for frivolous returns?
Answer 1.03: You’ve made an invalid presumption that IRS even has the lawful authority to financially penalize natural persons (biological people) who are nontaxpayers who file tax returns and indicate a zero liability. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the income tax is and always has been an indirect excise tax. Even the Congressional Research Service Report 97-59A agrees with this conclusion. Indirect taxes are on privileged corporations and not biological people. Click here to see the evidence. We establish in section 5.4.6 of The Great IRS Hoax book that the IRS does NOT have the lawful authority to subject natural persons to penalties for frivolous or false returns. Only corporations and employees of corporations, who are the entities subject to this indirect tax, are subject to such penalties under 26 CFR 301.6671-1(b). The reason they can’t penalize natural people lawfully is because of the Constitutional prohibition against Bills of Attainder, which are financia
Related Questions
- Can the Dunn and Chadwick book, Protecting Study Volunteers in Research, be used to satisfy the requirement for human subject protection training?
- Are people and businesses located at the Airport subject to the Earnings and Payroll Expense Tax?
- Is Commuter Tax Benefit subject to complex IRS requirements?
