Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does exaggerated morphology preclude plasticity to cuckoldry in the midshipman fish ( Porichthys notatus)?

0
Posted

Does exaggerated morphology preclude plasticity to cuckoldry in the midshipman fish ( Porichthys notatus)?

0

In species with more than one male reproductive morph, there typically exists a larger morph with exaggerated secondary sexual characters, and a smaller morph with reduced secondary sexual characters. These “exaggerated” and “reduced” morphologies are commonly thought to represent specializations to alternative behavioral reproductive tactics-large body size and exaggerated secondary sexual characters should both facilitate territoriality, courtship, and pair-spawning; while small body size and reduced secondary sexual characters should facilitate “sneaky” cuckoldry. Given this postulated relationship between morphology and behavior, we examined the relationship between the morphology of exaggerated males and cuckoldry. In a field and aquarium study of the midshipman fish, a fish with both exaggerated and reduced morphs, we demonstrated cuckoldry in some males of the exaggerated morph. Since the “reduced” morphology is thought to be an adaptation towards sneaky cuckoldry, we predicted

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123