Does ethnicity affect Discourse Ethics internal logic?
The problem gets worse in the following case. Suppose that the disagreement is the (scientifically established) fact of a specific ethnical group and that this disagreement concerns not only one or even two basic legally protected security concerns that are central to democracy, but several of them. Given the rationale of Habermas universalization, the reiterated demonstration of non-acceptance by that specific ethical group can never be the witness of the substitution of ethnicity for reason, under the condition, of course, that the interpretation refers to and is performed against the background of the internal logic of the scheme. This means, in other words, that it never implicates that reason as universalizations topic has been supplanted by that of ethnicity, simply because it is the projects aim to overcome and to clear up ethnicity and ethno-centricity by means of universals that are founded in and established by reason. It follows that the reiterated demonstration of disagreem
