does EPA decide whether a substitute is acceptable or unacceptable?
EPA’s decision on the acceptability of new substitutes proposed by manufacturers is based primarily on the potential human health and environmental risks posed by the substitutes as compared to (in the case of halons) the halon being replaced, as well as to other substitute fire-control agents. The screening of new substitutes is done separately for each specific application, such as for a total flooding agent or for use as a streaming agent. A listing of ‘acceptable’ does not imply that the agent is necessarily effective for a particular fire hazard or site, and users are advised to consult with a fire protection professional for selection of appropriate agents.
Related Questions
- When reporting MBE/WBE utilization under the EPA State Revolving Fund Program, is it acceptable to claim MBE and WBE participation generated from sources beyond the EPA capitalization amount(s) of the EPA grant?
- How does EPA determine what the effects of pesticides on humans are and whether they are acceptable?
- does EPA decide whether a substitute is acceptable or unacceptable?
