Does consortium performance support the national program objectives and the national strategic plan (1996-2000) priorities?
• Other important criteria for maximum score: • fair distribution and timely costing of consortium funds; • fair distribution of student awards for member institutions; • diversity results; • evidence of interdisciplinary projects, courses, etc.; • evidence of effort to communicate and establish working relationship with NASA Centers; • evidence of fair distribution of consortium funds to member institutions; • evidence of fair competition for funding; • evidence of fair grievance resolution among member institutions; • evidence of sound fiscal responsibility including timely costing, un-liquidated obligations, and timely submission of Federal Cash Transaction Report Standard Form 272-A; • evidence of annual meetings with all affiliates to discuss consortium and plan for growth • annual conference for students, faculty, administrators to communicate results, share ideas, etc. • Weaknesses addressed with solutions to overcome-5% Criteria for scoring CMIS reports (30%): • All pertinent f
Related Questions
- Can Brown and Associates, Inc. assist me in creating a Strategic Program Design for optimum performance from staff?
- How does the NSW Wetland Recovery Program link to the Australian Government’s National Plan for Water Security?
- How does the Inventory Monitoring Program (IMP) support National Park Service mission?
