Does change subvert structure?
Human values or value theory in the axiology field of philosophy might be regarded as being concurrent with aesthetic values. The referents of aesthetic value theories must have some sort of a structure-even if it is a nominal rrepresentation that can be abstracted for it’s translation into statistical representation. Interestingly the various options for statistically representing an aesthetic referent vary considerably in regard to their relationship to the referent. If one were to encode the Mona Lisa into one of a thousand forms of representative form would any at all not actually keeping the original values in-themselves have meaning? The meaning seems naturally to fall into the perception of the aesthetic thing for itself rather than in a statistically representative translation. Mathematical representation of forces of the Universe may have an abstract beauty in-themselves not only in form but in epistemological elegance. If the meaning of words is within the pragmatic ontology
