Does acceptance of the RA pose a future risk to the practice of radiology?
The profession of radiology is ever-evolving. The ACR is concerned about the potential effect of this position on the future of our members. However, the only thing that seems certain at this point is change. By considering this issue, the ACR chose to promote the development of the RA. We are aware of the acrimonious scope-of-practice battles that have occurred between other physician and ancillary provider groups. By developing the RA roles and responsibilities document, the ASRT and the ACR sought to improve patient care while addressing some of the human resource shortfalls that were occurring in the radiologic technologist field at the time. Question: Should states enact legislation or regulations instituting an RA or RPA designation? Answer: The ACR supports state legislation or regulation that embraces the development of the RA consistent with the roles and responsibilities developed by the ACR Council. The ACR will work with its chapters and the ASRT to ensure that state scope
