Does a pedophile-rapist or a con man get the longer jail sentence?
See, you just think you know the answer, but you would be wrong. Riddle me this… What kind of world do we live in, where we put more value in the punishment of a playboy/con man-thief over the punishment of a sadistic pedophile-rapist? How does that even happen, much less make sense? Someone please explain to me why living a pretentious playboy lifestyle… “Tome raider’ conman jailed for trying to sell stolen Shakespeare manuscript for £2m in bid to bring Cuban showgirl to Britain. The conman walked into the Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington DC with a copy of the 1623 First Folio and asked for it to be verified as genuine. The copy had been stolen a decade earlier from Durham University. Experts at the library, which houses around a third of the world’s 228 surviving copies of the First Folio, found it had been ‘damaged, brutalised and mutilated’ to hide its provenance and called the FBI. Jailing him for eight years at Newcastle Crown Court, Judge Richard Lowden said: ‘You wanted
