Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does 50 Years to Life for Shoplifting $153.54 Worth of Videotapes Violate the Eighth Amendment?

0
Posted

Does 50 Years to Life for Shoplifting $153.54 Worth of Videotapes Violate the Eighth Amendment?

0

Lockyer v. Andrade Docket No. 01-1127 From: The Ninth Circuit Case at a Glance Leandro Andrade was convicted in state court of two counts of shoplifting $153.54 worth of children’s videotapes from K-Mart. Because he had at least two prior felony convictions, California’s “Three Strikes” law applied. As required by that law, he was sentenced to consecutive sentences of 25 years to life. The question now is whether the total sentence of at least 50 years imprisonment with no possibility of parole is “grossly disproportionate” to Andrade’s crime and thus violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishments.” • Previewed by Ian Heath Gershengorn, a partner with Jenner & Block, LLC in Washington, D.C.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123