Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you think using only wikipedia to answer a question is lame? Why or why not?

answer lame think Wikipedia
0
Posted

Do you think using only wikipedia to answer a question is lame? Why or why not?

0

I think if someone asks a question about something, if you go to Wikipedia and copy and paste this neverending answer, it’s lame… BUT, if you actually know something on the subject, but feel a little snippit from Wikipedia could help explain a little more what you are trying to say, or give exact info, I see nothing lame with a copy/paste of a paragraph or few sentances. I hate the neverending answers that go on and on..Usually I’ll read the first few lines but skip the rest. That’s just laziness. But see nothing wrong with a little copy/paste here and there. I don’t mind if someone does that if I’m looking for something specific, because if it gives me the answer I’m looking for, then that’s fine.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123