Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you think the atomic bombing of hiroshima was justified?

0
Posted

Do you think the atomic bombing of hiroshima was justified?

0

Absolutely not. Never at the time, never in hindsight. It was militarily unnecessary to drop atomic bombs to end WWII. Generals including Dwight Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur believed that Japan would’ve surrendered eventually without dropping atomic bombs. Eisenhower believed atomic bombs were not the answer to save American lives and refused to support the idea of killing civilians en masse. MacArthur (who was in charge in the Pacific) believed that Japan would surrender if the Allies simply told Japan that they could keep their emperor after the war. Japan thought that an unconditional surrender meant that their emperor was to stand down and be tried as a war criminal. This was not the case but the Allies failed to tell Japan. Had they done so, MacArthur believed Japan would’ve surrendered much earlier. It was also militarily unnecessary to invade Japan. Generals including Carl Spaatz believed that Japan was in fact hoping for a US invasion because that would mean US casualties w

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123