Do you think that opening questions to vote makes then poor in reliableness?
I was thinking about this earlier today becuase I’ve had some really good answers given to me and I couldn’t choose just one. I ended up doing so because I didn’t want a silly answer to beat out an answer that, obviously, the answerer took the time to think about. My conclusion: I think we should be able to choose more than one best answer. Maybe up to three?? Some answers touch on one area more or less than another and, together, they give you the complete answer you’re looking for. I’m anxious to know the “the team” thinks about this suggestion. Thanks!
Related Questions
- What do you think the US needs to continue to grow the sport, and more importantly even, to let it develop its own character rather than being the poor cousin of Euro racing?
- Do you think that the widening gap between rich and poor contributes to roken Britain?
- Do you think that opening questions to vote makes then poor in reliableness?
