Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you think President Turman was right in using the atomic bomb aganist Japan?

0
Posted

Do you think President Turman was right in using the atomic bomb aganist Japan?

0

OldCW wears The COAT of the Cosmos Mar 14th, 2009 Invading Japan would have been extremely costly in lives. It is a big place and would not have surrendered quickly or easily. But that pales in comparison to the importance of the first hand knowledge the world now has of the horror of nuclear war. Had we not exploded those bombs and then witnessed the horrific aftermath, our knowledge of what might happen would have been hypothetical. I’m sorry the Japanese had to suffer, they’re good people, but their sacrifice may have averted total nuclear annihilation for the whole human race. So perhaps unlike most suffering, this time it had purpose and meaning. Like (3 people like this.) • Report 2 comments | Post one | Permalink Comments Bacchus…lives Very good answer! Report Mar 14th, 2009 deltabtry ^^^Yep I agree! Report Mar 14th, 2009 Add a comment… • ad_client = “ca-answerbag_html”; num_ads = “4”; type = “text”; channels = “S_200x200,W_Ask,P_Question,Users_Unregistered,C_Social_Sciences

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123