Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you think colonial outrage over the Boston Massacre was justified?Explain.?

0
Posted

Do you think colonial outrage over the Boston Massacre was justified?Explain.?

0

The Boston Massacre that took place on March 5, 1770 was not really a massacre but the killing of three to five people in a street incident. An angry mob of ruffians pestered and attacked a squad of British soldiers. Finally the soldiers fired into the crowd killing three and wounding eight more. An angry group of Boston citizens demanded the removal of the British troops and the trial of Captain Preston and his men for murder. At Preston’s trial John Adams, later President, and Josiah Quincy were council for the defense. It could not be proved that Preston ordered his troops to fire and he was acquitted. But two of the British soldiers were later found guilty of murder. The incident was used to rally the colonists against British policies by propagandists, Paul Revere did a famous engraving of the unfortunate incident that helped to inflame public opinion. It was one of the events that led to the Revolutionary War. So I would have to say that colonial outrage was not justified over th

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123