Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you support giving U.S. commanders the option of using of nuclear “bunker buster” missiles in Iraq?

0
Posted

Do you support giving U.S. commanders the option of using of nuclear “bunker buster” missiles in Iraq?

0

WYDEN: Not on the basis of the evidence that exists today. I think the administration’s statement that they were considering nuclear weapons was a very regrettable step. It’s also inconsistent with what they’ve said about nonproliferation. SMITH: We should examine carefully the effects of any weapons, but we should not automatically preclude the use of technology that might quicken resolution of conflict and lessen American and innocent casualties. WU: No. WALDEN: Such a decision should be made only by the president and only under the most extraordinary circumstances. I would have strong reservations about using nuclear “bunker busters” unless absolutely no other means were available. BLUMENAUER: If we use nuclear weapons when we are overwhelmingly more powerful than Iraq, we lose all moral high ground to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons elsewhere. How do we tell North Korea not to go ahead with their nuclear-weapons program? DEFAZIO: No. It would be a very, very dangerous

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123