Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you plan to provide a C++ or Java class for writing the output for the AllDuplicate task?

class Java output Plan Task writing
0
Posted

Do you plan to provide a C++ or Java class for writing the output for the AllDuplicate task?

0

No, we do not plan to provide a C++ or Java class for writing the output for the AllDuplicate task. • Must the normalized similarity matrix be entirely normalized or just be normalized in the submatrix corresponding to the probe and gallery sigsets? How should we normalize scores for query samples not present in the probe sigset, while remaining in compliance with the independence constraints? A: The output of the similarity score normalization task is a new similarity matrix. The new similarity matrix is the submatrix corresponding to the probe and gallery sigsets. The probe set is a subset of the query set. • The document “Executable_Calling_Signatures_for_FRVT2006.pdf”, and in “Figure C: Example of a Signature Set” on page 7, has a different complex-presentation structure than posted on the BBS at http://bbs.bee-biometrics.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=139. Which one will be used? A: For 3D sigsets, the structure on posted on the BBS at http://bbs.bee-biometrics.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.ph

0

No, we do not plan to provide a C++ or Java class for writing the output for the AllDuplicate task.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123