Do you agree that a no fault personal injury compensation system is more equitable and efficient for society?
First off, you made the current system’s inefficiency clear by… saying the current system was inefficient. That’s not proof. Second, paying out via the state means the entire taxable populace will be paying whenever something privately owned is damaged. I’m fairly sure the exploitability of that is fairly obvious, not to mention the potential for fraud. Aside from that, any case in which there was a party deserving of punishment (murder and assorted fun stuff) would require people to argue innocence and guilt, and people to gather evidence, among others, meaning this would hardly be an effective reform at all unless we did away with the concept of justice altogether. — All right then. People will be paying every time someone is PERSONALLY INJURED. All other cases will apparently use the same system of this silly and outdated notion of ‘establishing guilt’. Punishing someone without investigation into the idea of their being guilty is far from ‘equitable’, so I’d have to say no on t
