Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do you “accept that [immigration] had enriched Britains culture and was good for the economy”?

0
Posted

Do you “accept that [immigration] had enriched Britains culture and was good for the economy”?

0

controlled immigration I.E. only allowing in immigrants that will be of benefit to the united kingdom its residents and lastly themselves is fine and has in the past enriched this country Although the first wave was against the immigrants wishes (slavery) the second wave was more for the benefit of this country than any altruistic motives .Post war a vast shortage of able bodied workers was filled by immigrants.Then you have today’s situation where every criminal in the world is trying to seek asylum in this country.I welcome with open arms anyone who wants to settle in this country and live by this countries values and within its laws but they have to have skills that are needed in this country before they are allowed to settle.I will also protect anyone who is genuinely victimised in their own country.

0

Positive immigration (if there is such a thing) is a small amount of immigrants per town bringing us their foods and to an extent their cultures (which i don’t care for much) i can be called a bigot i don’t care, i do like their food i don’t mind paying for it but i’ll be dammed to accept the mass immigration we have as beneficial

0
10

in the early 60s i think it did enriched the British culture, but for last 40 odd years it done nothing but harm and must shop!

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123