Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do They Reduce Pollution and Save Regulatory Costs?

0
Posted

Do They Reduce Pollution and Save Regulatory Costs?

0

Author InfoGuerrero, Santiago Innes, Robert Abstract State-level statutes provide firms that engage in environmental self-audits, and that self-report their environmental violations, with a variety of different regulatory rewards, including “immunity” from penalties and “privilege” for information contained in self-audits. This paper studies a panel of State-level industries from 1989-2003, in order to determine the effects of the different statutes on toxic pollution and government inspections. We find that, by encouraging self-auditing, privilege and limited immunity protections tend to reduce pollution and government enforcement activity; however, more sweeping immunity protections, by reducing firms’ pollution prevention incentives, raise toxic pollution and government inspection oversight. Download InfoTo download: If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format lin

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123