Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do the volume/age curves used as input for the CBM-CFS3 have to represent merchantable volume, and which should I use, gross merchantable volume curves or net?

0
Posted

Do the volume/age curves used as input for the CBM-CFS3 have to represent merchantable volume, and which should I use, gross merchantable volume curves or net?

0

The CBM-CFS3 calculates biomass components from merchantable volume. Calculations are done using a national system of volume-to-biomass estimation models developed as part of Canada’s national forest inventory (Boudewyn et al. 2007). Users modeling forests in British Columbia should use net merchantable volume curves, while users modeling forests in all other Canadian provinces and territories should use gross merchantable volume curves. The difference in curve type requirements between British Columbia and the rest of Canada is due to differences in the way merchantable volume was handled in the estimation models developed for Canada’s national forest inventory. Standard provincial and territorial merchantability criteria are assumed by the volume-to-biomass estimation models that are built into CBM-CFS3.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123