Do the Madhesis need rights of self-determination which is being most disputable?
Yes, all people/groups should have rights of self-determination as per norms of legitimated human rights and applied concept of democracy. So, what is wrong if Madhesis want it? There are various schools of thoughts about the rights of self-determination, although single interpretation can not be carried out as concrete one. The research concluded that the Madhesi version of self-determination signifies a kind of improved version of powerful decentralisation which is not totally new concept even for Nepal, it can be also considered as improved and modified democratic version of previously introduced the regional and local decentralisation concept, local governance acts and polices. Madhesis do not want any disintegration; they want just their own parliament, executive, judiciary and administrative system as per motto and goal of democracy based on federal State structure system. It is justified and natural that has already proved and applied in the cases of US, Switzerland, Germany, an
Related Questions
- How does Anthem notify a potential Qualifying Beneficiary of their rights and obligations under COBRA for those plans that have contracted with Anthem to provide COBRA administration services?
- Rights of publicity for the actorsQuestion: Is sexually explicit Fan Fiction protected by the First Amendment right to free speech?
- Is Their a Right to Self-Determination in the Case of Serious Human Rights Violations?
