Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do Poorer Schools Mean Poorer History Teaching?

0
Posted

Do Poorer Schools Mean Poorer History Teaching?

0

By Robert B. Townsend A new study from the Department of Education suggests that students at the poorest schools were less likely to have a fully qualified history teacher at the head of their class.1 This study analyzes how many history teachers held one of two qualifications a degree in the field (or at least a minor in history) and a certification to teach social studies. The report draws on a large survey of more than 51,000 school teachers in the 1999 2000 academic year, using the proportion of students receiving subsidized meals as a marker of relative poverty at the school. According to the study, just 44.9 percent of students in America’s high schools were taught by a teacher who had either majored or minored in history as undergraduate (only 37.4 percent by teachers who had majored in history). For students at schools where less than 10 percent of the student population received some subsidy for their lunches, more than 52 percent were taught history by a teacher with a major

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123