Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Do different disorders in cell cycle regulation account for different biological behavior of urothelial and sinonasal inverted papillomas?

0

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to assess the expression of selected cell cycle regulation genes in urothelial and sinonasal inverted papillomas (IP). METHODS: Archived surgically resected specimens from 18 urothelial and 19 sinonasal IP were studied immunohistochemically for p16, p53, cyclin D1 and Ki67. Staining results were semiquantified and compared between IP and adjacent control mucosa (CM). RESULTS: p53 expression did not differ between sinonasal and urothelial IP. Although there was a trend of higher p53 expression in IP compared with the adjacent CM in sinonasal and urothelial specimens, this trend failed to be statistically significant. p16 expression was significantly higher in urothelial IP and CM in comparison with their sinonasal counterparts, but did not differ significantly between IP and its adjacent CM either in urothelial or sinonasal specimens. There were no significant differences in the mean scores for cyclin D1 or Ki67. CONCLUSION: The changes in p53 exp

0

OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to assess the expression of selected cell cycle regulation genes in urothelial and sinonasal inverted papillomas (IP). METHODS: Archived surgically resected specimens from 18 urothelial and 19 sinonasal IP were studied immunohistochemically for p16, p53, cyclin D1 and Ki67. Staining results were semiquantified and compared between IP and adjacent control mucosa (CM). RESULTS: p53 expression did not differ between sinonasal and urothelial IP. Although there was a trend of higher p53 expression in IP compared with the adjacent CM in sinonasal and urothelial specimens, this trend failed to be statistically significant. p16 expression was significantly higher in urothelial IP and CM in comparison with their sinonasal counterparts, but did not differ significantly between IP and its adjacent CM either in urothelial or sinonasal specimens. There were no significant differences in the mean scores for cyclin D1 or Ki67. CONCLUSION: The changes in p53 exp

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123