Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Didn Chambers v Mississippi holt it unconstitutional for a judge to prevent a criminal defendants witnesses from testifying?

0
Posted

Didn Chambers v Mississippi holt it unconstitutional for a judge to prevent a criminal defendants witnesses from testifying?

0

Chambers v Mississippi acknowledged judges’ reasonable discretion to exclude misleading evidence, then found the trial judge’s exclusion of three reputable witnesses to whom a person other than the defendant had confessed the crime to be unreasonable.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123