Did the Supreme Court Make Discrimination Cases Unwinnable for Employers?
David Sherwyn Cornell University School of Hotel Administration, dss18{at}cornell.edu’ + u + ‘@’ + d + ”//–> Paul Wagner Stokes & Murphy Joe Baumgarten Proskauer Rose Following a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision, employers face the prospect of fighting employment discrimination cases that they cannot afford to win. A decision involving Caesars Palace held that based on a 1991 federal statute, a complaining employee need not give direct evidence of discrimination as part of the complaint. This is a change in the treatment formerly given to the so-called mixed motive concept, in which a personnel decision regarding an employee who is part of a protected class may be motivated by both legitimate business considerations and discrimination. In addition to apparently shifting the burden of proof, the federal law provides for jury trials in discrimination complaints. Because such trials involve considerable legal expense, employers who choose to litigate such cases may “win” but be impoveri
Related Questions
- eServices Supreme Court efiling County Court efiling County Court search civil cases Magistrates Court efiling Magistrates Court - Drivers Licence VCAT Online Paying an infringment notice?
- What are the names of the two property rights cases the Supreme Court decided this past term?
- Did the Supreme Court Make Discrimination Cases Unwinnable for Employers?
