Did the Long Range Facility Planning Committees provide in-depth analysis explaining its reasons for rejecting less expensive and academically equivalent solutions?
No. Although the LRFPC reports are lengthy, they contain virtually no in-depth analysis, or cost analysis of viable alternatives. In fact, it was reported that the LRFPC’s were told they should not consider costs at all, but rather to set forth every possible improvement that would enhance the educational experience of students without regard to whether such enhancements were needed to maintain Millburn’s tradition of academic excellence. Most significantly, there is no evidence the LRFPC solicited public opinions or other data regarding construction and enrollment issues. Public opinion and other surveys are typically performed by “citizen’s groups.” Given the size of the bond, the omission is inconceivable.
