Did the Grievant engage in inappropriate behavior with respect to the leaky cylinder incident?
Yes. Robison admits the comments attributed to him. It is simply his contention that Lukacena was guilty of a serious breach of safety protocol and would be held accountable for it. Robison was merely reporting Lukacenas actions to others in the bargaining unit, and the likely response of management. In fact, the statements used as a basis for his discipline were made to his fellow coworkers, not to management, and are exaggerated in any case. But the Employers arguments and evidence are far more persuasive. A thorough investigation established that Lukacena was not aware of any potential hazard and he did not knowingly place himself or any of his coworkers in danger. Despite knowing of the investigatory outcome, Robison for whatever reason spoke with at least four persons about Lukacena in a manner designed to discredit him. He knew his statements were fabricated; and they were vicious and malicious by implying that Lukacena would knowingly place his coworkers at risk. Robisons behavi
Related Questions
- Do you engage in risky sexual behavior (unprotected or promiscuous sex) or drug-related behavior that increases your risk of contacting HIV or viruses that can cause cancer?
- Does the CCR5 delta 32 mutation allow me to engage in risky behavior?
- How can I report a user for spam or inappropriate behavior?
