Did the District Court adequately state its reasons for Leggs sentence in its oral pronouncement [*2] of sentence?
3. Did the District Court adequately state its reasons for Legg’s sentence in its written judgment? 4. Did the District Court adequately consider the presentence investigation report’s recommendations for the least restrictive environment at sentencing? 5. Did the District Court err in not applying the exceptions to the mandatory minimum sentence? 6. Does Legg’s fifty-year sentence violate statutory sentencing policy? 7. Did the District Court err in failing to designate an offender level? 8. Did the District Court violate Legg’s substantive due process rights in sentencing him to fifty years in State prison? FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 5, 2001, R.G. reported to the Carbon County Sheriff’s Department that his nine-year-old daughter, N.J.G., had been sexually assaulted by Charles Legg. The following day, Carbon County Undersheriff Bob Reed (Reed) conducted a videotaped interview of N.J.G., who reported that Legg had been sexually assaulting her since June 2000. N.J.G.
