Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Did the Department of Labor err in determining that Cohen voluntarily quit her employment?

0
Posted

Did the Department of Labor err in determining that Cohen voluntarily quit her employment?

0

[9.] The unemployment insurance law provides for a disqualification from receiving benefits for persons who voluntarily quit their employment without good cause or who are discharged for work-connected misconduct. Reetz v. Lutheran Health Systems, 2000 SD 74, 9, 611 NW2d 230, 233. Cohen argues that the department of labor erred in determining that she voluntarily quit her employment and asserts instead that she was discharged when the library board refused to allow her to withdraw her resignation. Contending that the city failed to establish any misconduct as cause for her discharge, Cohen further argues that the department erred in denying her claim for unemployment insurance benefits. [10.] This Court’s standard of review in unemployment insurance cases is set forth in Weeks v. Valley Bank, 2000 SD 104, 8, 615 NW2d 179, 182: We review administrative decisions in the same manner as the circuit court. Factual findings may be overturned only if they are found to be “clearly erroneous” a

0
10

[9.] The unemployment insurance law provides for a disqualification from receiving benefits for persons who voluntarily quit their employment without good cause or who are discharged for work-connected misconduct. Reetz v. Lutheran Health Systems, 2000 SD 74, 9, 611 NW2d 230, 233. Cohen argues that the department of labor erred in determining that she voluntarily quit her employment and asserts instead that she was discharged when the library board refused to allow her to withdraw her resignation. Contending that the city failed to establish any misconduct as cause for her discharge, Cohen further argues that the department erred in denying her claim for unemployment insurance benefits. [10.] This Court’s standard of review in unemployment insurance cases is set forth in Weeks v. Valley Bank, 2000 SD 104, 8, 615 NW2d 179, 182: We review administrative decisions in the same manner as the circuit court. Factual findings may be overturned only if they are found to be “clearly erroneous” a

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.