Did SB 1016 change the frequency of CalRecycle review cycle?
In some cases, yes. For those jurisdictions that were below 50 percent in 2006, but were approved by the Board as having made a good faith effort in the 2005-06 Biennial Review, the review cycle remains on a two-year cycle. The next CalRecycle review for these jurisdictions will be conducted in 2010 and will cover the program reporting years of 2007-2009. Note: Due to the implementation timing of the legislation, the 2007 reporting year is included in the first two-year review cycle. For those jurisdictions that were at or above a 50 percent diversion rate in 2006 and had implemented their programs and were approved by the Board in 2005-06 Biennial Review, they are now on a four-year review cycle. The next CalRecycle review cycle for these jurisdictions will be conducted in 2012 and will cover the reporting years of 2007-11. Note: Due to the implementation timing of the legislation, the 2007 reporting year is being included in the four-year review cycle. For any jurisdictions that form
Related Questions
- If a faculty member has been on leave for a semester or year during the three-year cycle, should the teaching review cover additional semesters to bring the total of semesters to six?
- Does nutritionist review of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire improve data quality?
- Did SB 1016 change the frequency of the Board review cycle?
