DID OPTICAL SCANNERS ENSURE A FIXED NH PRIMARY?
An astonishing voter education project posted on YouTube.com clearly demonstrates and explains in minutes just how the New Hampshire Primary vote count could have been altered ( Silvestro the cat / NH voting ) to provide Hillary Clinton with her win over Barack Obama according to voting activist group, BlackBoxVoting.org. Beverly Harris, the group s spokesperson, has long asserted that Diebold optical-scanners used to tabulate the New Hampshire Primary have no secondary cross-check or audit to ensure accuracy, all of which relies upon the faith of the voters that election night ballot counts were not altered with malice. According to Harris, LHS associates a single private entity contracted by the state astonishingly had control over coding for every memory card in New Hampshire while requiring a right of access to any Diebold voting machine at any time, services the machines, maintains the machines and handles repairs, replacements and troubleshooting on Election Day. Ken Hajjar, a ke
Related Questions
- Isn’t the whole point of a specification to establish fixed point of reference so that all parties implementing the standard can ensure they have a common baseline of compatibility?
- How do I ensure that I exercise appropriate stewardship over public monies in the course of managing Investing in Primary Care monies?
- DID OPTICAL SCANNERS ENSURE A FIXED NH PRIMARY?
