Did Appellee Comply With a Condition Precedent to Nova Assuming Any Liability Under the Contract?
In their sixth issue, the only issue in which appellants challenge appellee=s breach of contract cause of action, appellants argue there is no evidence that appellee complied with a condition precedent to Nova assuming liability under the contract. Specifically, appellants assert there was no evidence appellee gave written notice of the problem to Nova as required by paragraph 6(c) of the contract. Appellants= argument is without merit.
Related Questions
- What is the liability of the contractor who awards sub-contracts after getting such specified works contract?
- After purchasing the short sale property, can I cancel the contract owing to a condition without panelty?
- Did Appellee Comply With a Condition Precedent to Nova Assuming Any Liability Under the Contract?
