Could the Protocol result in the exclusion of one persons testimony because another person refused to undergo examination?
No. There is no combination of circumstances where that would happen. Where the testimony of two or more witnesses from the same side would corroborate each other, and some of them refuse to be examined, the one who refuse are regarded as deceptive, and they are subject to the provisions pertaining to exclusion and impeachment of untrustworthy testimony. The others may undergo examination, and depending on the outcome may testify.
Related Questions
- What is the protocol or the correct thing to do when using an interpreter – do I direct my questions or answers to the Deaf person or the interpreter? Who do I look at?
- Could the Protocol result in the exclusion of one persons testimony because another person refused to undergo examination?
- What are the prerequisites for a healing session to be successful? How many times does a person need to undergo a session?
