Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Could Robert Taylor have continued to double BLC investors money?

0
Posted

Could Robert Taylor have continued to double BLC investors money?

0

No. As Judge Hogan found, on September 1, 1995, Mr. Taylor had only about $2.7 million in the bank but was obligated to pay investors more than $50 million over the next three months. Since the BLC made no profits from any legitimate business activity, Mr. Taylor had to raise this $50 million from new investors. It would have been virtually impossible for him to pull in such an enormous amount of money from new investors by December 1, 1995. But even if he had found a way, he then would have owed those new investors over $100 million by March 1, 1996. The doubling would have continued every three monthsand there was no way for Mr. Taylor to get out of it without defaulting. Like all Ponzi schemes, the “Advertising Pool” was doomed to fail and leave thousands of investors empty-handed.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123