Could a creationist please give a definition of the word “falsifiable ” as in …………?
I would say that you can falsify anything based on your definition. That doesn’t make it scientific theory. I could state that I “can” test evolution and it would become scientific theory. Just because you “can” test something doesn’t mean you did, or you will. Your definition is close, but not quite accurate enough. I would say not only capable of being tested, but being in the testing process with a control group in order to disprove it. Falsify does after all have a negative meaning. As for peope saying evolution is just a theory, well it is. It is one of many theories. Just because they are different conclusions that both end in the same result (an attempted explanation of where life comes from) doesn’t mean that either has been disproved, or tested. NOW people believe you cannot verify or falsify creation therefore it is not scientific theory. Well I state that you can test it just as evolution is being tested, so is creation. And neither have been proved or disproved. That is why
