contains conflicting information (for example, motorized viewing will double, access should be cut by 25-50%). How do you balance such conflicting information?
The Scientific Assessment mostly focused on characterizing social, economic, and ecological information and conditions from historic to current conditions. A few general projections were made into the future. These were mostly centered on socio-economic trends and trends across the landscape. Society is faced with making choices about the future in many areas that might appear to conflict. The demand for roaded recreation access and the desire to reduce adverse ecological impacts from roads is an example. The assessment does not state what “should” be done in regards to potential conflict. Those choices are made through the EIS process and in future decisions. 17. Baker City, OR: The Draft EIS does not adequately reflect the scientific findings by implementing default standards during the period of time before watershed analyses are completed. Will a supplemental Draft EIS be prepared to avoid making changes between the Draft EIS and Final EIS that are too great to be legally defensibl
Related Questions
- contains conflicting information (for example, motorized viewing will double, access should be cut by 25-50%). How do you balance such conflicting information?
- Why does the picture appear as double images (Crosstalk) while viewing 3D content?
- What are the sizes of the holes the Single and Double gang templates cut?
