Considering the shipping and handling costs, could the GIK funds be better used by programs?
Because GIK is planned for, and requested by National Offices, the products are increasingly seen as integral to the programs, not just “extras.” More importantly, because of the high leverage factor, much more can be achieved with GIK than could be done with cash alone. Donors often give specifically for GIK because of these high leverage ratios.
Related Questions
- Our no-cost extension funds will go mostly to fixed costs and professional development. Where can I go to find funding for the important programs we should be continuing?
- Considering the shipping and handling costs, could the GIK funds be better used by programs?
- Can the FHC subsidy funds be used with other grant programs?
